An assessment of the foundational assumptions in high-resolution climate projections: the case of UKCP09

DOI10.1007/S11229-015-0739-8zbMATH Open1357.86002OpenAlexW2149749504WikidataQ61930576 ScholiaQ61930576MaRDI QIDQ513894FDOQ513894

Authors: Roman Frigg, Leonard A. Smith, David A. Stainforth 

Publication date: 8 March 2017

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/61635/1/__lse.ac.uk_storage_LIBRARY_Secondary_libfile_shared_repository_Content_Frigg%2C%20R_Assessment%20of%20foundation_Frigg_Assessment%20of%20foundation_2015.pdf

Recommendations

• Assessing climate model projections: state of the art and philosophical reflections
• Climate projections using Bayesian model averaging and space-time dependence
• Biases and uncertainty in climate projections
• On constraining projections of future climate using observations and simulations from multiple climate models
• Uncertainty in weather and climate prediction

zbMATH Keywords

predictionsimulationmodelreliabilityprojectionclimate changeemulationprobabilitydecision-makingstructural model errorsystematic error

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Computational methods for problems pertaining to geophysics (86-08) Meteorology and atmospheric physics (86A10)

Cites Work

• Bayesian calibration of computer models. (With discussion)
• Indistinguishable states. II: The imperfect model scenario
• Spatial analysis to quantify numerical model bias and dependence

Cited In (1)

• Assessing climate model projections: state of the art and philosophical reflections

This page was built for publication: An assessment of the foundational assumptions in high-resolution climate projections: the case of UKCP09

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q513894)