Firm failure prediction: financial distress model vs traditional models

DOI10.17535/CRORR.2018.0021MaRDI QIDQ5145065zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Ivica Pervan, Maja Pervan, Tamara Kuvek

Publication date 19 January 2021

Published in Croatian operational research review (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/crorr/article/view/7313

zbMATH Keywords

bankruptcyCroatiafinancial distressfirm failurerescue plan

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Corporate finance (dividends, real options, etc.) (91G50)

Recommendations

• Bankruptcy prediction using terminal failure processes
• Modeling company failure: a longitudinal study of Turkish banks
• Comparing firm failure predictions between Logit, KMV, and ZPP models: Evidence from Taiwan's electronics industry
• Early discovery of individual firm insolvency
• A comparison of Bayesian, hazard, and mixed logit model of bankruptcy prediction

Cited in

(6)

• Multi-criteria ranking of corporate distress prediction models: empirical evaluation and methodological contributions
• Comparing firm failure predictions between Logit, KMV, and ZPP models: Evidence from Taiwan's electronics industry
• Modeling company failure: a longitudinal study of Turkish banks
• PREDICTION OF FINANCIAL DISTRESS BY MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: THE CASE OF FIRMS TAKEN INTO THE SURVEILLANCE MARKET IN THE ISTANBUL STOCK EXCHANGE
• Early discovery of individual firm insolvency
• Improving accuracy of financial distress prediction by considering volatility: an interval-data-based discriminant model

This page was built for publication: Firm failure prediction: financial distress model vs traditional models

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5145065)