A comparison of the superbosonization formula and the generalized Hubbard–Stratonovich transformation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5192068
Abstract: Recently, two different approaches were put forward to extend the supersymmetry method in random matrix theory from Gaussian ensembles to general rotation invariant ensembles. These approaches are the generalized Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation and the superbosonization formula. Here, we prove the equivalence of both approaches. To this end, we reduce integrals over functions of supersymmetric Wishart-matrices to integrals over quadratic supermatrices of certain symmetries.
Recommendations
Cited in
(15)- Supersymmetry approach to Wishart correlation matrices: exact results
- Preserving topology while breaking chirality: from chiral orthogonal to anti-symmetric Hermitian ensemble
- Optimal lower bound on the least singular value of the shifted Ginibre ensemble
- Superbosonization via Riesz superdistributions
- Local tail statistics of heavy-tailed random matrix ensembles with unitary invariance
- Equivalence of domains for hyperbolic Hubbard-Stratonovich transformations
- Symmetry crossover protecting chirality in Dirac spectra
- Winding number statistics for chiral random matrices: Averaging ratios of determinants with parametric dependence
- Random matrix approach to three-dimensional QCD with a Chern-Simons term
- Supersymmetry for systems with unitary disorder: circular ensembles
- Arbitrary rotation invariant random matrix ensembles and supersymmetry: orthogonal and unitary-symplectic case
- GUE-chGUE transition preserving chirality at finite matrix size
- Superbosonization
- The correlated Jacobi and the correlated Cauchy-Lorentz ensembles
- Superbosonization of invariant random matrix ensembles
This page was built for publication: A comparison of the superbosonization formula and the generalized Hubbard–Stratonovich transformation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5192068)