Testing homogeneity of effect sizes in pooling 2x2 contingency tables from multiple studies: a comparison of methods

DOI10.1080/25742558.2018.1478698zbMath1426.62310OpenAlexW2803465964MaRDI QIDQ5193266

Edwin R. van den Heuvel, Osama Almalik

Publication date: 10 September 2019

Published in: Cogent Mathematics & Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/25742558.2018.1478698

zbMATH Keywords

logistic regressiongeneralized linear mixed modelmulti-center trialsBliss statisticBreslow-Day statisticCochran's \(Q\)-statisticpeto statisticWoolf statistic

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Hypothesis testing in multivariate analysis (62H15) Generalized linear models (logistic models) (62J12) Contingency tables (62H17)

Related Items (2)

On the exact null-distribution of a test for homogeneity of the risk ratio in meta-analysis of studies with rare events ⋮ How reliable are the multiple comparison methods for odds ratio?

Cites Work

• Testing for Homogeneity in Meta-Analysis I. The One-Parameter Case: Standardized Mean Difference
• The Use of Score Tests for Inference on Variance Components
• Statistics in Epidemiology: The Case-Control Study
• A Monte Carlo Investigation of Homogeneity Tests of the Odds Ratio under Various Sample Size Configurations
• Tests for homogeneity of odds ratio when the data are sparse
• Generalized linear mixed models a pseudo-likelihood approach
• The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Testing homogeneity of effect sizes in pooling 2x2 contingency tables from multiple studies: a comparison of methods