Small-bias is not enough to hit read-once CNF
From MaRDI portal
Publication:519906
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3477793 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1559537 (Why is no real title available?)
- A new general derandomization method
- A simple proof of Bazzi's theorem
- Almost \(k\)-wise independent sets establish hitting sets for width-3 1-branching programs
- Approximate inclusion-exclusion
- Hardness vs randomness
- How to Generate Cryptographically Strong Sequences of Pseudorandom Bits
- Improved pseudorandom generators for depth 2 circuits
- Polylogarithmic independence can fool DNF formulas
- Polylogarithmic independence fools \(\mathrm{AC}^{0}\) circuits
- Pseudorandom Bit Generators That Fool Modular Sums
- Pseudorandom bits for constant depth circuits
- Simple Constructions of Almost k-wise Independent Random Variables
- Small Sample Spaces Cannot Fool Low Degree Polynomials
- Small-Bias Probability Spaces: Efficient Constructions and Applications
- Small-Bias Spaces for Group Products
- Two results on polynomial interpolation in equally spaced points
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: Small-bias is not enough to hit read-once CNF
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q519906)