¿“Natural” y “Euclidiana”? Reflexiones sobre la geometría práctica y sus raíces cognitivas

DOI10.1387/THEORIA.17839MaRDI QIDQ5205214zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors José Ferreirós, M. García Pérez

Publication date 10 December 2019

Published in THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.17839

zbMATH Keywords

Chinese geometrycognitive archaeologycognitive toolscomparative historycore cognitiongeometric cognition

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Methodology of mathematics (00A35) History of Greek and Roman mathematics (01A20) History of Chinese mathematics (01A25) History of geometry (51-03) Comprehensive works on geometry education (97G10)

Recommendations

• Teaching Euclid in a practical context: linear perspective and practical geometry
• From practical to pure geometry and back
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5011546

Cited in

(3)

• Cognitive artifacts for geometric reasoning
• The normal road to geometry: \(\delta\acute{\eta}\) in Euclid's \textit{Elements} and the mathematical competence of his audience
• Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian indigene group

This page was built for publication: ¿“Natural” y “Euclidiana”? Reflexiones sobre la geometría práctica y sus raíces cognitivas

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5205214)