Model fusion and multiple testing in the likelihood paradigm: shrinkage and evidence supporting a point null hypothesis
DOI10.1080/02331888.2019.1660342zbMATH Open1435.62291OpenAlexW2292143718WikidataQ110632754 ScholiaQ110632754MaRDI QIDQ5205846FDOQ5205846
Authors: David R. Bickel, Abbas Rahal 
Publication date: 17 December 2019
Published in: Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10393/31897
Recommendations
Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01) Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing (62J15)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A STATISTICAL PARADOX
- Statistical Evidence
- Large-Scale Simultaneous Hypothesis Testing
- The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
- Bayesian model selection and statistical modeling.
- Multiple testing procedures with applications to genomics.
- Likelihood methods in statistics
- Model Selection and Model Averaging
- Large-scale inference. Empirical Bayes methods for estimation, testing, and prediction
- An empirical Bayes mixture method for effect size and false discovery rate estimation
- Bayesian model selection and model averaging
- Large deviations and idempotent probability
- On the Generalization of the Likelihood Function and the Likelihood Principle
- Decision making on the sole basis of statistical likelihood
- The strength of statistical evidence for composite hypotheses: inference to the best explanation
- Estimators of the local false discovery rate designed for small numbers of tests
- Game-theoretic probability combination with applications to resolving conflicts between statistical methods
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- How the Maximal Evidence of P-Values Against Point Null Hypotheses Depends on Sample Size
- A predictive approach to measuring the strength of statistical evidence for single and multiple comparisons
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Small-scale inference: empirical Bayes and confidence methods for as few as a single comparison
- Comment
- Rejoinder
- Blending Bayesian and frequentist methods according to the precision of prior information with applications to hypothesis testing
- Inference after checking multiple Bayesian models for data conflict and applications to mitigating the influence of rejected priors
- Correcting false discovery rates for their bias toward false positives
- Self-consistent confidence sets and tests of composite hypotheses applicable to restricted parameters
- A likelihood paradigm for clinical trials
- Pseudo-likelihood, explanatory power, and Bayes's theorem [Comment on: ``A likelihood paradigm for clinical trials]
- The likelihood as statistical evidence in multiple comparisons in clinical trials: no free lunch
- A note on fiducial model averaging as an alternative to checking Bayesian and frequentist models
- Confidence distributions applied to propagating uncertainty to inference based on estimating the local false discovery rate: a fiducial continuum from confidence sets to empirical Bayes set estimates as the number of comparisons increases
Cited In (4)
- A predictive approach to measuring the strength of statistical evidence for single and multiple comparisons
- Fisher's disjunction as the principle vindicating \(p\)-values, confidence intervals, and their generalizations: a frequentist semantics for possibility theory
- The sufficiency of the evidence, the relevancy of the evidence, and quantifying both with a single number
- Coherent checking and updating of Bayesian models without specifying the model space: a decision-theoretic semantics for possibility theory
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Model fusion and multiple testing in the likelihood paradigm: shrinkage and evidence supporting a point null hypothesis
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5205846)
