A notion of C-justification for empirical statements
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- Anti-realist truth and truth-recognition
- Constructible falsity
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3139759 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3497871 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6130986 (Why is no real title available?)
- Intuitionistic views on the nature of mathematics
- Meaning and proofs: on the conflict between classical and intuitionistic logic
- Necessity of thought
- Truth as an epistemic notion
Cited in
(11)- A semantics and methodology for \textit{ceteris paribus} hypotheses
- Game of grounds
- Denotational semantics for languages of epistemic grounding based on Prawitz's theory of grounds
- Proofs, grounds and empty functions: epistemic compulsion in Prawitz's semantics
- Calculi of epistemic grounding based on Prawitz's theory of grounds
- Introduction: Inferences and proofs
- Inference and epistemic transparency
- Dag Prawitz on proofs, operations and grounding
- Towards a semantics based on the notion of justification
- Meaning and justification. An internalist theory of meaning
- Are proofs objects or acts? A comparison of Prawitz's and Sundholm's semantics
This page was built for publication: A notion of \(C\)-justification for empirical statements
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5213621)