A comparison of two varying coefficient meta-analysis methods for an average risk difference
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5220874
Recommendations
- Meta-analysis methods for risk differences
- Comparison of Meta-Analysis Versus Analysis of Variance of Individual Patient Data
- The failure of meta-analytic asymptotics for the seemingly efficient estimator of the common risk difference
- Comparison of methods for fixed effect meta-regression of standardized differences of means
- Testing the significance of a common risk difference in meta-analysis.
- Meta-analysis methodology for combining treatment effects from Cox proportional hazard models with different covariate adjustments
Cites work
- A note on confidence interval estimation for a linear function of binomial proportions
- An improved confidence interval for a linear function of binomial proportions
- Analysis of Categorical Data by Linear Models
- Introduction to Meta‐Analysis
- Meta-analysis methods for risk differences
- New large-sample confidence intervals for a linear combination of binomial proportions
- Simple and Effective Confidence Intervals for Proportions and Differences of Proportions Result from Adding Two Successes and Two Failures
- Variance stabilizing the difference of two binomial proportions
Cited in
(4)- Comparison of methods for fixed effect meta-regression of standardized differences of means
- Meta-analysis methodology for combining treatment effects from Cox proportional hazard models with different covariate adjustments
- Meta-analysis methods for risk differences
- Meta-analysis of the difference of medians
This page was built for publication: A comparison of two varying coefficient meta-analysis methods for an average risk difference
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5220874)
