Enriching deontic logic
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5222687
DOI10.1093/LOGCOM/EXY007zbMATH Open1443.03011OpenAlexW2794882303MaRDI QIDQ5222687FDOQ5222687
Authors: Ilaria Canavotto, Alessandro Giordani
Publication date: 10 July 2019
Published in: Journal Of Logic And Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10807/117815
Recommendations
contrary-to-duty obligationaction deontic logicchoice permissionought-to-be logicought-to-do logicsequential permission
Cited In (16)
- Quantificational entitlements and relevantoid deontic logic
- The logic of permission and obligation in the framework of ALX. 3: How to avoid the paradoxes of deontic logics
- Introducing Grades in Deontic Logics
- The dynamic logic of permission
- Conditional deontic logic augmented with defeasible reasoning
- The paradoxes of permission an action based solution
- Utilitarian deontic logic
- Rich deontic logic: A preliminary study
- From oughts to goals: a logic for Enkrasia
- A logical framework for the Islamic law
- Deontic STIT logic, from logical paradox to security policy
- Toward a linguistic interpretation of deontic paradoxes. Beth-Reichenbach semantics approach for a new analysis of the miners scenario
- Introducing Exclusion Logic as a Deontic Logic
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Basic action deontic logic
- An extension of the deontic calculus \(DSC_ 1\)
This page was built for publication: Enriching deontic logic
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5222687)