Treewidth of display graphs: bounds, brambles and applications

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5233142

DOI10.7155/JGAA.00508zbMATH Open1419.05187arXiv1809.00907OpenAlexW2972917334MaRDI QIDQ5233142FDOQ5233142

Author name not available (Why is that?)

Publication date: 16 September 2019

Published in: Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Phylogenetic trees and networks are leaf-labelled graphs used to model evolution. Display graphs are created by identifying common leaf labels in two or more phylogenetic trees or networks. The treewidth of such graphs is bounded as a function of many common dissimilarity measures between phylogenetic trees and this has been leveraged in fixed parameter tractability results. Here we further elucidate the properties of display graphs and their interaction with treewidth. We show that it is NP-hard to recognize display graphs, but that display graphs of bounded treewidth can be recognized in linear time. Next we show that if a phylogenetic network displays (i.e. topologically embeds) a phylogenetic tree, the treewidth of their display graph is bounded by a function of the treewidth of the original network (and also by various other parameters). In fact, using a bramble argument we show that this treewidth bound is sharp up to an additive term of 1. We leverage this bound to give an FPT algorithm, parameterized by treewidth, for determining whether a network displays a tree, which is an intensively-studied problem in the field. We conclude with a discussion on the future use of display graphs and treewidth in phylogenetics.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.00907




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (5)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Treewidth of display graphs: bounds, brambles and applications

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5233142)