Good is not good enough. Deriving optimal distinguishers from communication theory
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5265066
DOI10.1007/978-3-662-44709-3_4zbMATH Open1383.94003OpenAlexW249674870MaRDI QIDQ5265066FDOQ5265066
Annelie Heuser, Olivier Rioul, Sylvain Guilley
Publication date: 21 July 2015
Published in: Advanced Information Systems Engineering (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44709-3_4
Recommendations
- Masks will fall off. Higher-order optimal distinguishers
- Confused yet successful: theoretical comparison of distinguishers for monobit leakages in terms of confusion coefficient and SNR
- On the optimality and practicability of mutual information analysis in some scenarios
- Generic side-channel distinguishers: improvements and limitations
- A key to success. Success exponents for side-channel distinguishers
maximum likelihoodcommunication channeldistinguishercorrelation power analysisuniform noiseLaplacian noiseSide-channel analysis
Cited In (6)
- On the implementation efficiency of linear regression-based side-channel attacks
- Confused yet successful: theoretical comparison of distinguishers for monobit leakages in terms of confusion coefficient and SNR
- Codes for Side-Channel Attacks and Protections
- Leakage certification made simple
- On the optimality and practicability of mutual information analysis in some scenarios
- Not optimal but efficient: a distinguisher based on the Kruskal-Wallis test
This page was built for publication: Good is not good enough. Deriving optimal distinguishers from communication theory
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5265066)