Counterexamples for IFS-attractors

From MaRDI portal
Publication:528408

DOI10.1016/J.CHAOS.2015.12.006zbMATH Open1360.28010arXiv1510.03391OpenAlexW2278018503WikidataQ124809294 ScholiaQ124809294MaRDI QIDQ528408FDOQ528408


Authors: Magdalena Nowak, M. Fernández-Martínez Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 12 May 2017

Published in: Chaos, Solitons and Fractals (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In this paper, we deal with the part of Fractal Theory related to finite families of (weak) contractions, called iterated function systems (IFS, herein). An attractor is a compact set which remains invariant for such a family. Thus, we consider spaces homeomorphic to attractors of either IFS or weak IFS, as well, which we will refer to as Banach and topological fractals, respectively. We present a collection of counterexamples in order to show that all the presented definitions are essential, though they are not equivalent in general.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.03391




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (12)





This page was built for publication: Counterexamples for IFS-attractors

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q528408)