Theory of semi-instantiation in abstract argumentation
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:528522)
Abstract: We study instantiated abstract argumentation frames of the form , where is an abstract argumentation frame and where the arguments of are instantiated by as well formed formulas of a well known logic, for example as Boolean formulas or as predicate logic formulas or as modal logic formulas. We use the method of conceptual analysis to derive the properties of our proposed system. We seek to define the notion of complete extensions for such systems and provide algorithms for finding such extensions. We further develop a theory of instantiation in the abstract, using the framework of Boolean attack formations and of conjunctive and disjunctive attacks. We discuss applications and compare critically with the existing related literature.
Recommendations
- On the semantics of abstract argumentation
- Computational Complexity of Semi-stable Semantics in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7696694
- The hidden power of abstract argumentation semantics
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- A Logic of Abstract Argumentation
- A general approach to extension-based semantics in abstract argumentation
- Explanation semantics for abstract argumentation
- On the semantics of abstract argumentation frameworks: a logic programming approach
- Abducible Semantics and Argumentation
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1301606 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 932649 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3073037 (Why is no real title available?)
- A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments
- A formalist philosophy of mathematics. I: Arithmetic
- A logical account of formal argumentation
- An equational approach to logic programming
- Approximating operators and semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
- Argumentation and answer set programming
- Complete extensions in argumentation coincide with 3-valued stable models in logic programming
- Dung's argumentation is essentially equivalent to classical propositional logic with the Peirce-Quine dagger
- Fibring argumentation frames
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- N-Prolog: An extension of prolog with hypothetical implication. II. Logical foundations, and negation as failure
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Revision, acceptability and context. Theoretical and algorithmic aspects.
- Revisiting Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- Sequent-based argumentation for normative reasoning
- Solving weighted argumentation frameworks with soft constraints
- The attack as strong negation. I
- The equational approach to contrary-to-duty obligations
Cited in
(12)- Theory Instantiation
- On the semantics of abstract argumentation
- Complexity of semi-stable and stage semantics in argumentation frameworks
- Towards a general theory of decomposability in abstract argumentation
- On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation
- Abstract argumentation systems
- On the instantiation of knowledge bases in abstract argumentation frameworks
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- Automata for infinite argumentation structures
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6902516 (Why is no real title available?)
- Beyond maxi-consistent argumentation operators
- Abducible Semantics and Argumentation
This page was built for publication: Theory of semi-instantiation in abstract argumentation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q528522)