Abstract: I review arguments demonstrating how the concept of "particle" numbers arises in the form of equidistant energy eigenvalues of coupled harmonic oscillators representing free fields. Their quantum numbers (numbers of nodes of the wave functions) can be interpreted as occupation numbers for objects with a formal mass (defined by the field equation) and spatial wave number ("momentum") characterizing classical field modes. A superposition of different oscillator eigenstates, all consisting of n modes having one node, while all others have none, defines a nondegenerate "n-particle wave function". Other discrete properties and phenomena (such as particle positions and "events") can be understood by means of the fast but smooth process of decoherence: the irreversible dislocalization of superpositions. Any wave-particle dualism thus becomes obsolete. The observation of individual outcomes of this decoherence process in measurements requires either a subsequent collapse of the wave function or a "branching observer" in accordance with the Schr"odinger equation - both possibilities applying clearly after the decoherence process. Any probability interpretation of the wave function in terms of local elements of reality, such as particles or other classical concepts, would open a Pandora's box of paradoxes, as is illustrated by various misnomers that have become popular in quantum theory.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 947411 (Why is no real title available?)
- Energy cross term for a quantum vortex ring
- Heisenberg quantization for systems of identical particles
- Niels Bohr as philosopher of experiment: does decoherence theory challenge bohr's doctrine of classical concepts?
- On EPR-type entanglement in the experiments of Scully et al. I. The micromaser case and delayed-choice quantum erasure
- Pointer states for primordial fluctuations in inflationary cosmology
- Quantum Fields in Curved Space
- Quantum Gravity
- Symmetries, superselection rules, and decoherence
- Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels
- The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Measurement Process
- The physical basis of the direction of time.
- There is no ``first quantization
- Why the brain is probably not a quantum computer
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: Quantum discreteness is an illusion
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q535633)
