Explicit and less explicit algorithmic thinking, 1200--1500. Jordanus de Nemore, and the contrast between Barthélemy de Romans et Chuquet
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5377862
DOI10.19272/201809201001zbMATH Open1455.01004MaRDI QIDQ5377862FDOQ5377862
Authors: Jens Høyrup
Publication date: 27 May 2019
Recommendations
- When is the algorithm concept pertinent -- and when not? Thoughts about algorithms and paradigmatic examples, and about algorithmic and non-algorithmic mathematical cultures
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3934391
- The Algorithm Concept – Tool for Historiographic Interpretation or Red Herring?
- From Abacus to Algorism: Theory and Practice in Medieval Arithmetic
- On the algorithmic tradition in the history of mathematics
Cited In (4)
- When is the algorithm concept pertinent -- and when not? Thoughts about algorithms and paradigmatic examples, and about algorithmic and non-algorithmic mathematical cultures
- Zahl als Zeichen - Zur ``Technisierung der Arithmetik im Mittelalter. (Number as a sign - on the ``technization of arithmetics in the Middle Ages)
- Book review of: M. Folkerts and M. Hellman, Adam Ries Coß 1. In 2 volumes. Volume 1. Text volume. Volume 2. Commentary volume. The commentary on Coß 1. Transcribed and edited by Bernd Rüdiger and Rainer Gebhardt
- Book review of: Regiomontanus, Johannes Regiomontanus: Problems and exercises in algebra
This page was built for publication: Explicit and less explicit algorithmic thinking, 1200--1500. Jordanus de Nemore, and the contrast between Barthélemy de Romans et Chuquet
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5377862)