Leibniz’s Laws of Continuity and Homogeneity
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5410109
Abstract: We explore Leibniz's understanding of the differential calculus, and argue that his methods were more coherent than is generally recognized. The foundations of the historical infinitesimal calculus of Newton and Leibniz have been a target of numerous criticisms. Some of the critics believed to have found logical fallacies in its foundations. We present a detailed textual analysis of Leibniz's seminal text Cum Prodiisset, and argue that Leibniz's system for differential calculus was free of contradictions.
Cited in
(17)- A transfer principle for the continuations of real functions to the Levi-Civita field
- Is Leibnizian calculus embeddable in first order logic?
- Toward a history of mathematics focused on procedures
- The Mathematical Intelligencer flunks the Olympics
- Procedures of Leibnizian infinitesimal calculus: an account in three modern frameworks
- Tools, objects, and chimeras: Connes on the role of hyperreals in mathematics
- Controversies in the foundations of analysis: comments on Schubring's \textit{Conflicts}
- Euler's lute and Edwards's oud
- Motion and continuity
- Periodic words connected with the tribonacci-Lucas numbers
- On history of epsilontics
- Leibniz's syncategorematic infinitesimals. II: Their existence, their use and their role in the justification of the differential calculus
- Almost equal: the method of adequality from Diophantus to Fermat and beyond
- Proofs and retributions, or: why Sarah can't take limits
- A Cauchy-Dirac delta function
- An integer construction of infinitesimals: toward a theory of eudoxus hyperreals
- Possibility vs iterativity: Leibniz and Aristotle on the infinite
This page was built for publication: Leibniz’s Laws of Continuity and Homogeneity
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5410109)