Controversies in the foundations of analysis: comments on Schubring's \textit{Conflicts}
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2013410
DOI10.1007/s10699-015-9473-4zbMath1368.01021arXiv1601.00059OpenAlexW3103819722MaRDI QIDQ2013410
Piotr Błaszczyk, David Sherry, Kanovei, Vladimir, Mikhail G. Katz
Publication date: 17 August 2017
Published in: Foundations of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.00059
Related Items (6)
Toward a history of mathematics focused on procedures ⋮ Gregory's sixth operation ⋮ Cauchy's infinitesimals, his sum theorem, and foundational paradigms ⋮ LEIBNIZ ON BODIES AND INFINITIES: RERUM NATURA AND MATHEMATICAL FICTIONS ⋮ 19th-century real analysis, forward and backward ⋮ Three case studies in current Leibniz scholarship
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Euler's lute and Edwards's oud
- The development of Euclidean axiomatics. The systems of principles and the foundations of mathematics in editions of the \textit{Elements} in the early modern age
- Who gave you the Cauchy-Weierstrass tale? The dual history of rigorous calculus
- Stevin numbers and reality
- A Cauchy-Dirac delta function
- Ten misconceptions from the history of analysis and their debunking
- Leibniz's infinitesimals: their fictionality, their modern implementations, and their foes from Berkeley to Russell and beyond
- Eine Erweiterung der Infinitesimalrechnung
- Cauchy's Cours d'analyse. An annotated translation
- Infinitely small quantities in Cauchy's textbooks
- Definite values of infinite sums: Aspects of the foundations of infinitesimal analysis around 1820
- Tools, objects, and chimeras: Connes on the role of hyperreals in mathematics
- In defence of geometrical algebra
- Comments on a paper on alleged misconceptions regarding the history of analysis: who has misconceptions?
- A Burgessian critique of nominalistic tendencies in contemporary mathematics and its historiography
- Conflicts between generalization, rigor and intuition. Number concepts underlying the development of analysis in 17th--19th century France and Germany
- Neue Gesichtspunkte zum 5. Buch Euklids
- Did Cauchy plagiarize Bolzano?
- Fermat, Leibniz, Euler, and the Gang: The True History of the Concepts of Limit and Shadow
- EARLY HISTORY OF GEOMETRIC PROBABILITY AND STEREOLOGY
- Is mathematical history written by the victors?
- Nonstandard Analysis, Infinitesimals, and the History of Calculus
- Cauchy's Continuum
- Almost Equal: the Method of Adequality from Diophantus to Fermat and Beyond
- Leibniz’s Laws of Continuity and Homogeneity
- Rings of Real-Valued Continuous Functions. I
This page was built for publication: Controversies in the foundations of analysis: comments on Schubring's \textit{Conflicts}
