A Burgessian critique of nominalistic tendencies in contemporary mathematics and its historiography

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2391944

DOI10.1007/S10699-011-9223-1zbMATH Open1283.03006arXiv1104.0375OpenAlexW2076162902WikidataQ55871461 ScholiaQ55871461MaRDI QIDQ2391944FDOQ2391944


Authors: Karin U. Katz, Mikhail G. Katz Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 5 August 2013

Published in: Foundations of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We analyze the developments in mathematical rigor from the viewpoint of a Burgessian critique of nominalistic reconstructions. We apply such a critique to the reconstruction of infinitesimal analysis accomplished through the efforts of Cantor, Dedekind, and Weierstrass; to the reconstruction of Cauchy's foundational work associated with the work of Boyer and Grabiner; and to Bishop's constructivist reconstruction of classical analysis. We examine the effects of a nominalist disposition on historiography, teaching, and research.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.0375




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (18)





This page was built for publication: A Burgessian critique of nominalistic tendencies in contemporary mathematics and its historiography

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2391944)