Ten misconceptions from the history of analysis and their debunking
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:360440)
Abstract: The widespread idea that infinitesimals were "eliminated" by the "great triumvirate" of Cantor, Dedekind, and Weierstrass is refuted by an uninterrupted chain of work on infinitesimal-enriched number systems. The elimination claim is an oversimplification created by triumvirate followers, who tend to view the history of analysis as a pre-ordained march toward the radiant future of Weierstrassian epsilontics. In the present text, we document distortions of the history of analysis stemming from the triumvirate ideology of ontological minimalism, which identified the continuum with a single number system. Such anachronistic distortions characterize the received interpretation of Stevin, Leibniz, d'Alembert, Cauchy, and others.
Recommendations
- Cantor on infinitesimals. Historical and modern perspective
- Nonstandard Analysis and the History of Classical Analysis
- A Burgessian critique of nominalistic tendencies in contemporary mathematics and its historiography
- A brief history of analysis. With emphasis on philosophy, concepts, and numbers, including Weierstraß' real numbers
- Is mathematical history written by the victors?
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2186128 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6115396 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3841940 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5285446 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5505771 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3908369 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3978014 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4069225 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3691293 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3739803 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 193521 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3521895 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3559571 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3636028 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 520713 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1150716 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1520531 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2150130 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1926546 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4120133 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 764898 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3274705 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3182321 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3050863 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3099153 (Why is no real title available?)
- A Burgessian critique of nominalistic tendencies in contemporary mathematics and its historiography
- A new look at e.g. Björling and the Cauchy sum theorem
- A non-standard representation for Brownian motion and Ito integration
- Advanced mathematical thinking
- Alpha-theory: An elementary axiomatics for nonstandard analysis
- An epsilon of room. I: Real analysis. Pages from year three of a mathematical blog
- An integer construction of infinitesimals: toward a theory of eudoxus hyperreals
- Analysis with Ultrasmall Numbers
- Axiomatic foundations for Nonstandard Analysis
- Bolzano, Cauchy, Epsilon, Delta
- CAUCHY'S VARIABLES AND ORDERS OF THE INFINITELY SMALL
- Cauchy and the continuum: the significance of non-standard analysis for the history and philosophy of mathematics
- Cauchy et Bolzano
- Cauchy's continuum
- Conflicts between generalization, rigor and intuition. Number concepts underlying the development of analysis in 17th--19th century France and Germany
- D'Alembert's proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra
- Dedekind's Theorem: √2 × √3 = √6
- Definite values of infinite sums: Aspects of the foundations of infinitesimal analysis around 1820
- Detleff Clüver: An Early Opponent of the Leibnizian Differential Calculus
- Did Cauchy plagiarize Bolzano?
- Differentials, higher-order differentials and the derivative in the Leibnizian calculus
- Don't take me half the way: On Berkeley on mathematical reasoning
- Early delta functions and the use of infinitesimals in research
- Fermat's method of maxima and minima and of tangents. A reconstruction
- God, king, and geometry: revisiting the introduction to Cauchy's \textit{Cours d'analyse}
- Hermann Grassmann and the Creation of Linear Algebra
- How to define a number? A general epistemological account of Simon Stevin's art of defining
- Idealization in Cassirer's Philosophy of Mathematics
- Infinitely small quantities in Cauchy's textbooks
- Infinitesimals
- Infinitesimals without logic
- Intermolecular forces of infinite range and the Boltzmann equation
- Internal set theory: A new approach to nonstandard analysis
- Leibniz's infinitesimals: their fictionality, their modern implementations, and their foes from Berkeley to Russell and beyond
- Leibniz's rigorous foundation of infinitesimal geometry by means of Riemannian sums
- Looking at graphs through infinitesimal microscopes, windows and telescopes
- Measuring the size of infinite collections of natural numbers: was Cantor's theory of infinite number inevitable?
- Modern infinitesimals as a tool to match intuitive and formal reasoning in analysis
- Newton and the notion of limit
- Nominalism and constructivism in seventeenth-century mathematical philosophy
- Non-standard analysis
- Noncommutative geometry and reality
- Nonstandard Analysis
- Numbers and models, standard and nonstandard
- On Cauchy's Notion of Infinitesimal
- On the Historical Development of Infinitesimal Mathematics
- One of Berkeley's arguments on compensating errors in the calculus
- Operational semantics for timed systems. A non-standard approach to uniform modeling of timed and hybrid systems.
- Perceiving the infinite and the infinitesimal world: unveiling and optical diagrams in mathematics
- Plato's ghost. The modernist transformation of mathematics
- Quantifiers in limits
- Renaissance notions of number and magnitude
- Rings of Real-Valued Continuous Functions. I
- Stevin numbers and reality
- The Role of Paradoxes in the Evolution of Mathematics
- The absolute arithmetic continuum and the unification of all numbers great and small
- The fundamental theorem of algebra and complexity theory
- The hyperreal line
- The mathematics of the past: distinguishing its history from our heritage
- The real numbers as a wreath product
- The ring of Fermat reals
- The rise of non-Archimedean mathematics and the roots of a misconception. I: The emergence of non-Archimedean systems of magnitudes
- The ultraproduct construction
- The wake of Berkeley's analyst: Rigor mathematicae?
- Using the history of calculus to teach calculus
- What is mathematical truth?
- Who Gave You the Epsilon? Cauchy and the Origins of Rigorous Calculus
- Who gave you the Cauchy-Weierstrass tale? The dual history of rigorous calculus
- Über die Nicht-charakterisierbarkeit der Zahlenreihe mittels endlich oder abzählbar unendlich vieler Aussagen mit ausschliesslich Zahlenvariablen
Cited in
(19)- Assigning probabilities to non-Lipschitz mechanical systems
- Pre‐Robinson approach to the theory of infinitesimals
- An improved setting for generalized functions: fine ultrafunctions
- A Burgessian critique of nominalistic tendencies in contemporary mathematics and its historiography
- Toward a history of mathematics focused on procedures
- Tools, objects, and chimeras: Connes on the role of hyperreals in mathematics
- Comments on a paper on alleged misconceptions regarding the history of analysis: who has misconceptions?
- Controversies in the foundations of analysis: comments on Schubring's \textit{Conflicts}
- Reflections on the World-wide History of the Rule of False Double Position, or: How a Loop Was Closed
- Leibniz's infinitesimals: their fictionality, their modern implementations, and their foes from Berkeley to Russell and beyond
- Historical infinitesimalists and modern historiography of infinitesimals
- On history of epsilontics
- Hyperspace fermions, Möbius transformations, Krein space, fermion doubling, dark matter
- Almost equal: the method of adequality from Diophantus to Fermat and beyond
- Stevin numbers and reality
- Proofs and retributions, or: why Sarah can't take limits
- A Cauchy-Dirac delta function
- An integer construction of infinitesimals: toward a theory of eudoxus hyperreals
- Cantor on infinitesimals. Historical and modern perspective
This page was built for publication: Ten misconceptions from the history of analysis and their debunking
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q360440)
