Ten misconceptions from the history of analysis and their debunking

From MaRDI portal
Publication:360440

DOI10.1007/S10699-012-9285-8zbMATH Open1291.01018arXiv1202.4153OpenAlexW2154088964WikidataQ54052778 ScholiaQ54052778MaRDI QIDQ360440FDOQ360440

David Sherry, Mikhail G. Katz, Piotr Błaszczyk

Publication date: 27 August 2013

Published in: Foundations of Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The widespread idea that infinitesimals were "eliminated" by the "great triumvirate" of Cantor, Dedekind, and Weierstrass is refuted by an uninterrupted chain of work on infinitesimal-enriched number systems. The elimination claim is an oversimplification created by triumvirate followers, who tend to view the history of analysis as a pre-ordained march toward the radiant future of Weierstrassian epsilontics. In the present text, we document distortions of the history of analysis stemming from the triumvirate ideology of ontological minimalism, which identified the continuum with a single number system. Such anachronistic distortions characterize the received interpretation of Stevin, Leibniz, d'Alembert, Cauchy, and others.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.4153




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (15)





This page was built for publication: Ten misconceptions from the history of analysis and their debunking

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q360440)