One of Berkeley's arguments on compensating errors in the calculus
From MaRDI portal
Publication:716158
DOI10.1016/J.HM.2010.07.001zbMATH Open1221.01060OpenAlexW1993306656WikidataQ56228032 ScholiaQ56228032MaRDI QIDQ716158FDOQ716158
Authors: Kirsti Andersen 
Publication date: 19 April 2011
Published in: Historia Mathematica (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hm.2010.07.001
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Differentials, higher-order differentials and the derivative in the Leibnizian calculus
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Conflicts between generalization, rigor and intuition. Number concepts underlying the development of analysis in 17th--19th century France and Germany
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Berkeley's The Analyst Revisited
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Deux moments de la critique du calcul infinitésimal : Michel Rolle et George Berkeley
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Of analytics and indivisibles : Hobbes on the methods of modem mathematics
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (9)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Procedures of Leibnizian infinitesimal calculus: an account in three modern frameworks
- Leibniz's infinitesimals: their fictionality, their modern implementations, and their foes from Berkeley to Russell and beyond
- Don't take me half the way: On Berkeley on mathematical reasoning
- The wake of Berkeley's analyst: Rigor mathematicae?
- Berkeley and the mathematical hypotheses
- Ten misconceptions from the history of analysis and their debunking
- Berkeley's The Analyst Revisited
- Deux moments de la critique du calcul infinitésimal : Michel Rolle et George Berkeley
This page was built for publication: One of Berkeley's arguments on compensating errors in the calculus
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q716158)
