Conflicts between generalization, rigor and intuition. Number concepts underlying the development of analysis in 17th--19th century France and Germany

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2484162

zbMath1086.01001MaRDI QIDQ2484162

Gert Schubring

Publication date: 29 July 2005

Published in: Sources and Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)




Related Items (34)

Cauchy's infinitesimals, his sum theorem, and foundational paradigmsThe Jesuits and the method of indivisiblesBoscovich's geometrical principle of continuity, and the ``mysteries of the infinityA Burgessian critique of nominalistic tendencies in contemporary mathematics and its historiographyThe notion of Natural Numbers among Germanic Mathematicians during the Second Half of the 18th CenturyA Medida de Informação de Shannon: EntropiaWho gave you the Cauchy-Weierstrass tale? The dual history of rigorous calculusStevin numbers and realityTen misconceptions from the history of analysis and their debunkingPeriodic words connected with the tribonacci-Lucas numbersTeaching arithmetic in the Habsburg Empire at the end of the 18th century -- a textbook exampleAxel Thue in contextInfinite analytical procedures for the computation of logarithms in works by Benito Bails (1731–1797)Does Mathematics Need Foundations?Wronski's Foundations of MathematicsLEIBNIZ ON BODIES AND INFINITIES: RERUM NATURA AND MATHEMATICAL FICTIONS19th-century real analysis, forward and backwardSchopenhauer and the Mathematical Intuition as the Foundation of GeometryWeyl and Intuitionistic InfinitesimalsLeibniz's infinitesimals: their fictionality, their modern implementations, and their foes from Berkeley to Russell and beyondHistory of mathematics: a global cultural approach. Abstracts from the workshop held December 13--19, 2020 (online meeting)The notion of variable quantities \(\omega\) in Bolzano's early worksContinuity in nature and in mathematics: Boltzmann and PoincaréComments on a paper on alleged misconceptions regarding the history of analysis: who has misconceptions?Controversies in the foundations of analysis: comments on Schubring's \textit{Conflicts}One of Berkeley's arguments on compensating errors in the calculusOn the conception of mathematical objects and methods in d'Alembert's philosophical textsPolemics in Public: Poncelet, Gergonne, Plücker, and the Duality ControversyPermanence as a principle of practiceThe development of the concept of uniform convergence in Karl Weierstrass's lectures and publications between 1861 and 1886“Je n’ai point ambitionnée d’être neuf”: Modern Geometry in Early Nineteenth-Century French TextbooksTeaching as an Indicator of Mathematical PracticesIntroducing differential calculus in Spain: The fluxion of the product and the quadrature of curves by Tomàs CerdàLeibniz on The Elimination of Infinitesimals




This page was built for publication: Conflicts between generalization, rigor and intuition. Number concepts underlying the development of analysis in 17th--19th century France and Germany