19th-century real analysis, forward and backward
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:6164797)
Abstract: 19th century real analysis received a major impetus from Cauchy's work. Cauchy mentions variable quantities, limits, and infinitesimals, but the meaning he attached to these terms is not identical to their modern meaning. Some Cauchy historians work in a conceptual scheme dominated by an assumption of a teleological nature of the evolution of real analysis toward a preordained outcome. Thus, Gilain and Siegmund-Schultze assume that references to limite in Cauchy's work necessarily imply that Cauchy was working with an Archi-medean continuum, whereas infinitesimals were merely a convenient figure of speech, for which Cauchy had in mind a complete justification in terms of Archimedean limits. However, there is another formalisation of Cauchy's procedures exploiting his limite, more consistent with Cauchy's ubiquitous use of infinitesimals, in terms of the standard part principle of modern infinitesimal analysis. We challenge a misconception according to which Cauchy was allegedly forced to teach infinitesimals at the Ecole Polytechnique. We show that the debate there concerned mainly the issue of rigor, a separate one from infinitesimals. A critique of Cauchy's approach by his contemporary de Prony sheds light on the meaning of rigor to Cauchy and his contemporaries. An attentive reading of Cauchy's work challenges received views on Cauchy's role in the history of analysis, and indicates that he was a pioneer of infinitesimal techniques as much as a harbinger of the Epsilontik.
Recommendations
Cites work
- Approaches to analysis with infinitesimals following Robinson, Nelson, and others
- Axiomatizing changing conceptions of the geometric continuum. I: Euclid-Hilbert
- Bolzano, Cauchy and the ``New Analysis of the early nineteenth century
- Cauchy, infinitesimals and ghosts of departed quantifiers
- Cauchy's Cours d'analyse. An annotated translation
- Conflicts between generalization, rigor and intuition. Number concepts underlying the development of analysis in 17th--19th century France and Germany
- Controversies in the foundations of analysis: comments on Schubring's \textit{Conflicts}
- Definite values of infinite sums: Aspects of the foundations of infinitesimal analysis around 1820
- Did Weierstrass’s differential calculus have a limit-avoiding character? His definition of a limit inϵ–δstyle
- Éléments d'analyse de Karl Weierstrass
- Fermat, Leibniz, Euler, and the gang: the true history of the concepts of limit and shadow
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2134675 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3817628 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3952702 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4049589 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4069225 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 50187 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1222940 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2018465 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1461211 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4120133 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3050863 (Why is no real title available?)
- Infinitely small quantities in Cauchy's textbooks
- Is mathematical history written by the victors?
- Leibniz's infinitesimals: their fictionality, their modern implementations, and their foes from Berkeley to Russell and beyond
- Measuring the size of infinite collections of natural numbers: was Cantor's theory of infinite number inevitable?
- Non-standard analysis
- On history of epsilontics
- On the Historical Development of Infinitesimal Mathematics
- Small oscillations of the pendulum, Euler's method, and adequality
- The first decade of the Institut Henri Poincaré, in particular the role of the Rockefeller foundation
- Toward a history of mathematics focused on procedures
- Who gave you the Cauchy-Weierstrass tale? The dual history of rigorous calculus
- Why is there philosophy of mathematics at all?
Cited in
(15)- Cauchy's conception of rigour in analysis
- Cauchy numbers as basis of infinitesimal mathematics.
- Bolzano, Cauchy, Epsilon, Delta
- A guide to Cauchy's calculus. A translation and analysis of \textit{Calcul infinitésimal}
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2134675 (Why is no real title available?)
- Who gave you the Cauchy-Weierstrass tale? The dual history of rigorous calculus
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3952702 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4103027 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4120133 (Why is no real title available?)
- Procedures of Leibnizian infinitesimal calculus: an account in three modern frameworks
- Continuity between Cauchy and Bolzano: issues of antecedents and priority
- On history of epsilontics
- Three case studies in current Leibniz scholarship
- Historical infinitesimalists and modern historiography of infinitesimals
- Episodes from the history of infinitesimals
This page was built for publication: 19th-century real analysis, forward and backward
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6164797)