Did Weierstrass’s differential calculus have a limit-avoiding character? His definition of a limit inϵ–δstyle
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5413565
DOI10.1080/17498430.2013.831241zbMath1291.01020OpenAlexW2033355377WikidataQ58595196 ScholiaQ58595196MaRDI QIDQ5413565
Publication date: 30 April 2014
Published in: BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/17498430.2013.831241
Related Items
Cauchy's infinitesimals, his sum theorem, and foundational paradigms ⋮ 19th-century real analysis, forward and backward ⋮ The notion of variable quantities \(\omega\) in Bolzano's early works ⋮ The development of the concept of uniform convergence in Karl Weierstrass's lectures and publications between 1861 and 1886
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Who gave you the Cauchy-Weierstrass tale? The dual history of rigorous calculus
- Cauchy's Cours d'analyse. An annotated translation
- Infinitely small quantities in Cauchy's textbooks
- Problèmes de l'histoire de l'analyse mathématique au XIXeme siecle. Cas de Karl Weierstrass et de Richard Dedekind
- Cauchy and the infinitely small
- Éléments d'analyse de Karl Weierstrass
This page was built for publication: Did Weierstrass’s differential calculus have a limit-avoiding character? His definition of a limit inϵ–δstyle