Estimating common parameters in heterogeneous random effects models
From MaRDI portal
Publication:546103
DOI10.1016/J.JSPI.2011.04.005zbMath1216.62091OpenAlexW1979681439MaRDI QIDQ546103
Publication date: 24 June 2011
Published in: Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2011.04.005
growth curve modelmaximum likelihoodvariance componentsestimating equationmeta-analysisrandom coefficient modelDerSimonian-Laird procedurealmost unbiased variance estimator
Estimation in multivariate analysis (62H12) Linear regression; mixed models (62J05) Sufficient statistics and fields (62B05)
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Random-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data
- Estimating common vector parameters in interlaboratory studies
- Linear and generalized linear mixed models and their applications.
- Prediction in random coefficient regression
- Logistic regression with random coefficients
- That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects. With comments and a rejoinder by the author
- Growth curve models and statistical diagnostics
- Efficiency of weighted averages
- How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts?
- Estimating Heteroscedastic Variances in Linear Models
- Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
- Valid Inference in Random Effects Meta‐Analysis
- Some general points in estimating heterogeneity variance with the DerSimonian-Laird estimator
- Combining Unbiased Estimators
This page was built for publication: Estimating common parameters in heterogeneous random effects models