Validation of the a posteriori error estimator based on polynomial preserving recovery for linear elements

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5698790





The authors study the steady state heat-conduction problem: \[ \begin{aligned} -\nabla(D\nabla u)&=f \quad \text{in } \Omega\\ \nu\cdot(D\nabla u)&=g\quad \text{on } \Gamma_N\\ u&=0\quad \text{on } \Gamma_D \end{aligned} \] where \(\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^{2},\partial\Omega=\Gamma_N\cup\Gamma_D\). Here \(\Gamma_N,\Gamma_D\) are disjoint and \(\nu\) is the outward normal. The purpose of the paper is to compare the quality of the a posteriori error estimator based on the polynomial preserving recovery and that based on the superconvergence patch recovery(PPR). The authors come to the conclusion that the estimator based on PPR is superior, which is confirmed by numerical experiments, too.











This page was built for publication: Validation of the a posteriori error estimator based on polynomial preserving recovery for linear elements

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5698790)