Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5868261
DOI10.1080/00031305.2018.1543137OpenAlexW2919176916MaRDI QIDQ5868261
Sander Greenland, David Trafimow, Valentin Amrhein
Publication date: 20 September 2022
Published in: The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1543137
hypothesis teststatistical modelconfidence intervalreplicationposterior probabilitysignificance test\(P\)-valueselective reportingauxiliary hypothesesunreplicable research
Related Items (7)
Publication Policies for Replicable Research and the Community-Wide False Discovery Rate ⋮ Toward Replicability With Confidence Intervals for the Exceedance Probability ⋮ P-values don’t measure evidence ⋮ Connecting simple and precise P‐values to complex and ambiguous realities (includes rejoinder to comments on “Divergence vs. decision P‐values”) ⋮ A Statistical Basis for Reporting Strength of Evidence as Pool Reduction ⋮ Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05” ⋮ On Causal Inferences for Personalized Medicine: How Hidden Causal Assumptions Led to Erroneous Causal Claims About the D-Value
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Computer Age Statistical Inference
- Testing Statistical Hypotheses of Equivalence and Noninferiority
- Sampling and Bayes' Inference in Scientific Modelling and Robustness
- P Values for Composite Null Models
- Asymptotic Distribution of P Values in Composite Null Models
- Abandon Statistical Significance
This page was built for publication: Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication