Multiple Perspectives on Inference for Two Simple Statistical Scenarios

DOI10.1080/00031305.2019.1565553OpenAlexW2903943377MaRDI QIDQ5868275

No author found.

Publication date: 20 September 2022

Published in: The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1565553

zbMATH Keywords

statistical paradigmsfrequentist or Bayesianmultilab analysistesting or estimation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Related Items (6)

P-values don’t measure evidence ⋮ Scientific self-correction: the Bayesian way ⋮ Connecting simple and precise P‐values to complex and ambiguous realities (includes rejoinder to comments on “Divergence vs. decision P‐values”) ⋮ A battle in the statistics wars: a simulation-based comparison of Bayesian, frequentist and Williamsonian methodologies ⋮ Analysis of type I and II error rates of Bayesian and frequentist parametric and nonparametric two-sample hypothesis tests under preliminary assessment of normality ⋮ Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”

Uses Software

• R
• Stan
• bridgesampling

Cites Work

• Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman have agreed on testing? (With comments and a rejoinder).
• Why Isn't Everyone a Bayesian?
• Abandon Statistical Significance
• The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
• Analytic posteriors for Pearson's correlation coefficient
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Multiple Perspectives on Inference for Two Simple Statistical Scenarios