Efficiently Backtesting Conditional Value-at-Risk and Conditional Expected Shortfall
DOI10.1080/01621459.2020.1763804zbMATH Open1506.62419OpenAlexW3023195812MaRDI QIDQ5881985FDOQ5881985
Qihui Su, Gengsheng Qin, Liang Peng, Zhongling Qin
Publication date: 14 March 2023
Published in: Journal of the American Statistical Association (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2020.1763804
Recommendations
Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Asymptotic properties of parametric tests (62F05) Applications of statistics to actuarial sciences and financial mathematics (62P05)
Cites Work
- Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity
- Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation
- Empirical likelihood and general estimating equations
- Empirical likelihood
- Smoothed empirical likelihood confidence intervals for quantiles
- Maximum likelihood estimation of pure GARCH and ARMA-GARCH processes
- Self-weighted and local quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for ARMA-GARCH/IGARCH models
- Global self-weighted and local quasi-maximum exponential likelihood estimators for ARMA-GARCH/IGARCH models
- Backtesting Parametric Value-at-Risk With Estimation Risk
Cited In (6)
- Backtesting Parametric Value-at-Risk With Estimation Risk
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Estimating and backtesting risk under heavy tails
- Bayesian value-at-risk backtesting: the case of annuity pricing
- Powerful Backtests for Historical Simulation Expected Shortfall Models
- Backtesting portfolio value‐at‐risk with estimated portfolio weights
This page was built for publication: Efficiently Backtesting Conditional Value-at-Risk and Conditional Expected Shortfall
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5881985)