The dispute between Carlini-Plana and Laplace on the theory of the moon
The authors present the lunar theory of Laplace and the results of Carlini-Plana and Demoiseau on lunar tables based only on the law of universal gravity. The author also exposes the dispute between Laplace and Carlini-Plana on their methods for obtaining accurate lunar tables. The dispute was provoked by the awarding, in 1820, of a prize of the Académie des Sciences in Paris to F. Carlini and G. Plana for their method of construction of lunar tables. There are included excerpts from the letters exchanged between Carlini--Plana and Laplace. The paper contains a good bibliography.
- Carlini and Plana on the Theory of the Moon and their Dispute with Laplace
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2186619
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 816089
- Leonhard Euler's early lunar theories 1725--1752
- The controversy surrounding the secular acceleration of the Moon's mean motion
- On a new analytic theory of the Moon's motion. III: Further corrections
- Galileo's lunar observations in the context of medieval lunar theory
This page was built for publication: The dispute between Carlini-Plana and Laplace on the theory of the moon
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5956448)