Neglected U(1) phase in the Schrödinger representation of quantum mechanics and particle number conserving formalisms for superconductivity

DOI10.1088/1751-8121/ACFF51MaRDI QIDQ6063370zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Hiroyasu Koizumi

Publication date 7 November 2023

Published in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.08759

zbMATH Keywords

Berry phaseDirac's neglected phasequantum mechanicsrepresentationSchrödingersuperconductivitytheories

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Derivations, dissipations and positive semigroups in (C^*)-algebras (46L57) Yang-Mills and other gauge theories in mechanics of particles and systems (70S15) General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Closed and approximate solutions to the Schrödinger, Dirac, Klein-Gordon and other equations of quantum mechanics (81Q05) Phase-space methods including Wigner distributions, etc. applied to problems in quantum mechanics (81S30) Many-body theory; quantum Hall effect (81V70) Statistical mechanics of superconductors (82D55)

Abstract: Superconductivity is reformulated as a phenomenon in which a stable velocity field is created by a $U(1)$ phase neglected by Dirac in the Schroedinger representation of quantum mechanics. The neglected phase gives rise to a $U(1)$ gauge field expressed as the Berry connection from many-body wave functions. The inclusion of this gauge field transforms the standard particle-number non-conserving formalism of superconductivity to a particle-number conserving one with many results of the former unaltered. In other words, the new formalism indicates that the current standard one is an approximation that effectively takes into account this neglected $U(1)$ gauge field by employing the particle-number non-conserving formalism. Since the standard and new formalisms are physically different, conflicting results are predicted in some cases. We reexamine the Josephson relation and show that a capacitance contribution of the Josephson junction to the $U(1)$ phase is missing in the standard formalism, and inclusion of it indicates that the standard theory actually does one agree with the experiment while the new one does. It is also shown that the dissipative quantum phase transition in Josephson junctions predicted in the standard theory does not exit in the new one in accordance with the recent experimental result.

Recommendations

• Schrödinger representation of quantum mechanics, Berry connection, and superconductivity
• Theory of supercurrent in superconductors
• Is electromagnetic gauge invariance spontaneously violated in superconductors?
• Quantum condensation in superconductivity perceived in its space–time aspects
• Quantum condensation in superconductivity perceived in its space–time aspects

Cites work

• Bogoliubov-de Gennes method and its applications
• Bose-Einstein Condensation and Liquid Helium
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3131829 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3203559 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3224467 (Why is no real title available?)
• Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits
• Note on a Theorem of Bloch Concerning Possible Causes of Superconductivity
• Path integrals and quantum anomalies
• Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling
• Quantum Liquids
• Schrödinger representation of quantum mechanics, Berry connection, and superconductivity
• Superconductive Tunneling
• Theory of Superconductivity
• Theory of supercurrent in superconductors

Cited in

(1)

• Constrained Hamiltonian dynamics for electrons in magnetic field and additional forces besides the Lorentz force acting on electrons

This page was built for publication: Neglected U(1) phase in the Schrödinger representation of quantum mechanics and particle number conserving formalisms for superconductivity

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6063370)