Meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with multiple thresholds: Comparison of different approaches
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6091692
DOI10.1002/BIMJ.202000091zbMath1523.62241OpenAlexW3108167468MaRDI QIDQ6091692
Unnamed Author, Antonia Zapf, Annika Hoyer, Unnamed Author, Unnamed Author, Unnamed Author
Publication date: 27 November 2023
Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.202000091
Cites Work
- A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
- Nonparametric analysis of clustered data in diagnostic trials: estimation problems in small sample sizes
- Sensitivity, specificity and ROC-curves in multiple reader diagnostic trials -- a unified, nonparametric approach
- Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies with Multiple Thresholds using Survival Methods
- Meta‐analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Assessment Studies with Varying Number of Thresholds
- Confidence Intervals for the Youden Index and Corresponding Optimal Cut-Point
This page was built for publication: Meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with multiple thresholds: Comparison of different approaches