Meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with multiple thresholds: Comparison of different approaches
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6091692
Cites work
- A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
- Confidence Intervals for the Youden Index and Corresponding Optimal Cut-Point
- Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies with multiple thresholds using survival methods
- Meta‐analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Assessment Studies with Varying Number of Thresholds
- Nonparametric analysis of clustered data in diagnostic trials: estimation problems in small sample sizes
- Sensitivity, specificity and ROC-curves in multiple reader diagnostic trials -- a unified, nonparametric approach
Cited in
(8)- Meta‐analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Assessment Studies with Varying Number of Thresholds
- A population‐averaged approach to diagnostic test meta‐analysis
- Alternative confidence interval methods used in the diagnostic accuracy studies
- Erratum
- Explaining the optimistic performance evaluation of newly proposed methods: a cross-design validation experiment
- Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with multiple thresholds: comparison of approaches in a simulation study
- System of linear equations to derive unreported test accuracy counts for meta-analysis
- Improved confidence regions in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
This page was built for publication: Meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with multiple thresholds: Comparison of different approaches
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6091692)
