On the converse of Gaschütz' complement theorem

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6095989



Abstract: Let N be a normal subgroup of a finite group G. Let Nle Hle G such that N has a complement in H and (|N|,|G:H|)=1. If N is abelian, a theorem of Gasch"utz asserts that N has a complement in G as well. Brandis has asked whether the commutativity of N can be replaced by some weaker property. We prove that N has a complement in G whenever all Sylow subgroups of N are abelian. On the other hand, we construct counterexamples if Z(N)cap N' e 1. For metabelian groups N, the condition Z(N)cap N'=1 implies the existence of complements. Finally, if N is perfect and centerless, then Gasch"utz' theorem holds for N if and only if Inn(N) has a complement in Aut(N).


Let \(G\) be a finite group, \(N\trianglelefteq G\). A subgroup \(H\leq G\) is called complement of \(N\) if \(G = HN\) and \(H\cap N = 1\) whence \(G\) is determined as \(G\cong N \rtimes H\). A theorem of Gaschütz' states that if \(N\) is an abelian normal subgroup of \(G\), \(N\leq H\leq G\), \(N\) has a complement in \(H\) and \(\gcd(|N|,|G:H|) = 1\). Then \(N\) has a complement in \(G\). The main result of the paper is a generalization of this theorem where it is shown that if all Sylow subgroups of \(N\) are abelian, then Gaschütz' theorem holds (Theorem 2). The author also provides several existence theorems for the complements. Moreover, several counterexamples which show how far these theorems can be generalized are also given.











This page was built for publication: On the converse of Gaschütz' complement theorem

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6095989)