Comparing the methods of alternating and simultaneous projections for two subspaces

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6146685



Abstract: We study the well-known methods of alternating and simultaneous projections when applied to two nonorthogonal linear subspaces of a real Euclidean space. Assuming that both of the methods have a common starting point chosen from either one of the subspaces, we show that the method of alternating projections converges significantly faster than the method of simultaneous projections. On the other hand, we provide examples of subspaces and starting points, where the method of simultaneous projections outperforms the method of alternating projections.


The best approximation problem for two linear subspaces \(A\) and \(B\) of \(\mathbb R^d\) is to find a point in the intersection \(A \cap B\) which is the closest to any given starting point \(x \in \mathbb R^d\). In this paper, the authors investigate two well known methods for solving this problem, the method of alternating projections and the method of simultaneous projections. The main results are to provide a set of conditions under which the former converges faster than the latter and to provide a different set of conditions under which the opposite behaviour can be observed. The Friedrichs angle between the two subspaces \(A\) and \(B\) plays an important role, but it is not sufficient to provide a complete characterization. To this end, the authors utilize the (more general) concept of principal angles.



Cites work









This page was built for publication: Comparing the methods of alternating and simultaneous projections for two subspaces

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6146685)