Bounding the list color function threshold from above

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6148301

DOI10.2140/INVOLVE.2023.16.849zbMATH Open1530.05046arXiv2207.04831OpenAlexW4389660651MaRDI QIDQ6148301FDOQ6148301


Authors:


Publication date: 11 January 2024

Published in: Involve (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The chromatic polynomial of a graph G, denoted P(G,m), is equal to the number of proper m-colorings of G for each minmathbbN. In 1990, Kostochka and Sidorenko introduced the list color function of graph G, denoted Pell(G,m), which is a list analogue of the chromatic polynomial. The list color function threshold of G, denoted au(G), is the smallest kgeqchi(G) such that Pell(G,m)=P(G,m) whenever mgeqk. It is known that for every graph G, au(G) is finite, and in fact, au(G)leq(|E(G)|1)/ln(1+sqrt2)+1. It is also known that when G is a cycle or chordal graph, G is enumeratively chromatic-choosable which means au(G)=chi(G). A recent paper of Kaul et al. suggests that understanding the list color function threshold of complete bipartite graphs is essential to the study of the extremal behavior of au. In this paper we show that for any ngeq2, au(K2,n)leqlceil(n+2.05)/1.24ceil which gives an improvement on the general upper bound for au(G) when G=K2,n. We also develop additional tools that allow us to show that au(K2,3)=chi(K2,3) and au(K2,4)=au(K2,5)=3.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.04831




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (1)





This page was built for publication: Bounding the list color function threshold from above

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6148301)