Anti-Euclidean or non-Euclidean? Tertium datur! Some methodological reflections on the history of science on occasion of the accusation of anachronism against Imre Tóth's interpretation of Aristotle

MaRDI QIDQ6152985zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors

Publication date 13 February 2024

zbMATH Keywords

history of mathematicsnon-Euclidean assumptions

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

History of Greek and Roman mathematics (01A20) History of geometry (51-03)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5897753
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1294233
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3520351
• Discovering non-Euclidean geometry (a teacher's viewpoint).
• Aristotle's axiom in the foundations of geometry

Cited in

(2)

• The parallel postulate
• Simple forms of Aristotle's axiom and of the \textit{Lotschnittaxiom}

This page was built for publication: Anti-Euclidean or non-Euclidean? Tertium datur! Some methodological reflections on the history of science on occasion of the accusation of anachronism against Imre Tóth's interpretation of Aristotle

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6152985)