Anti-Euclidean or non-Euclidean? Tertium datur! Some methodological reflections on the history of science on occasion of the accusation of anachronism against Imre Tóth's interpretation of Aristotle

MaRDI QIDQ6152985FDOQ6152985

Authors:

Publication date: 13 February 2024

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5897753
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1294233
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3520351
• Discovering non-Euclidean geometry (a teacher's viewpoint).
• Aristotle's axiom in the foundations of geometry

zbMATH Keywords

history of mathematicsnon-Euclidean assumptions

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

History of Greek and Roman mathematics (01A20) History of geometry (51-03)

Cited In (1)

• The parallel postulate

This page was built for publication: Anti-Euclidean or non-Euclidean? Tertium datur! Some methodological reflections on the history of science on occasion of the accusation of anachronism against Imre Tóth's interpretation of Aristotle

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6152985)