Anti-Euclidean or non-Euclidean? Tertium datur! Some methodological reflections on the history of science on occasion of the accusation of anachronism against Imre Tóth's interpretation of Aristotle (Q6152985)
From MaRDI portal
 | This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Anti-Euclidean or non-Euclidean? Tertium datur! Some methodological reflections on the history of science on occasion of the accusation of anachronism against Imre Tóth's interpretation of Aristotle |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7804218
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Anti-Euclidean or non-Euclidean? Tertium datur! Some methodological reflections on the history of science on occasion of the accusation of anachronism against Imre Tóth's interpretation of Aristotle |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7804218 |
Statements
13 February 2024
0 references
non-Euclidean assumptions
0 references
history of mathematics
0 references
0.7524480223655701
0 references
0.7419877052307129
0 references
