On the two types of affine structures for degenerating Kummer surfaces -- non-Archimedean vs Gromov-Hausdorff limits --

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6163769

zbMATH Open1523.14015arXiv2203.14543MaRDI QIDQ6163769FDOQ6163769


Authors: Keita Goto Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 30 June 2023

Published in: The New York Journal of Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Kontsevich and Soibelman constructed integral affine manifolds with singularities (IAMS, for short) for maximal degenerations of polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds in a non-Archimedean way. On the other hand, for each maximally degenerating family of polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds, we can consider the Gromov-Hausdorff limit of the fibers. It is expected that this Gromov-Hausdorff limit carries an IAMS-structure. Kontsevich and Soibelman conjectured that these two types of IAMS are the same. This conjecture is believed in the mirror symmetry context. In this paper, we prove the above conjecture for maximal degenerations of polarized Kummer surfaces.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.14543




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (4)





This page was built for publication: On the two types of affine structures for degenerating Kummer surfaces -- non-Archimedean vs Gromov-Hausdorff limits --

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6163769)