Audience role in mathematical proof development

DOI10.1007/s11229-020-02619-xzbMath1529.00020OpenAlexW3012459534MaRDI QIDQ6182763

Zoe Ashton

Publication date: 26 January 2024

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/16976/1/V8_NonAnon.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

knot theorydeductionproofargumentationmathematical practiceformal derivationaudience

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Methodology of mathematics (00A35)

Related Items (1)

Open texture and mathematics

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Mathematical cultures. The London meetings 2012--2014
• Forms and roles of diagrams in knot theory
• Informal proofs and mathematical rigour
• Intentional gaps in mathematical proofs
• The argument of mathematics
• Why do informal proofs conform to formal norms?
• Towards a theory of mathematical argument
• Arguing Around Mathematical Proofs
• A Problem with the Dependence of Informal Proofs on Formal Proofs
• Why the Naïve Derivation Recipe Model Cannot Explain How Mathematicians’ Proofs Secure Mathematical Knowledge
• The Derivation-Indicator View of Mathematical Practice
• Knot Invariants in Vienna and Princeton during the 1920s: Epistemic Configurations of Mathematical Research
• The Proof is in the Pudding

This page was built for publication: Audience role in mathematical proof development