Why Changes in PBGC and FDIC Premiums Should Not Fully Reflect Changes in Underlying Risk (With Some Application to Long-Term Private Insurance Contracts)

DOI10.1080/10920277.2022.2123362MaRDI QIDQ6192609zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors

Publication date 13 February 2024

Published in North American Actuarial Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2022.2123362

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Contract theory (moral hazard, adverse selection) (91B41) Actuarial mathematics (91G05)

Recommendations

• A risk-based premium: what does it nean for DB plan sponsors?
• Designing sound deposit insurances
• Fair pricing of deposit insurance. Is it possible? Yes. Is it desirable? No
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 764442
• Moral-hazard-free insurance: mean-variance premium principle and rank-dependent utility theory

Cites work

• Measuring ex ante welfare in insurance markets
• Risk management: coordinating corporate investment and financing policies
• The Microeconomics of Insurance
• The Role of Commitment in Dynamic Contracts: Evidence from Life Insurance

This page was built for publication: Why Changes in PBGC and FDIC Premiums Should Not Fully Reflect Changes in Underlying Risk (With Some Application to Long-Term Private Insurance Contracts)

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6192609)