THE FAIR REWARD PROBLEM: THE ILLUSION OF SUCCESS AND HOW TO SOLVE IT

DOI10.1142/S021952591950005XarXiv1902.04940OpenAlexW2937762610WikidataQ127350489 ScholiaQ127350489MaRDI QIDQ6203311FDOQ6203311

Spencer Wheatley, D. Sornette, Author name not available (Why is that?)

Publication date: 27 March 2024

Published in: Advances in Complex Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Humanity has been fascinated by the pursuit of fortune since time immemorial, and many successful outcomes benefit from strokes of luck. But success is subject to complexity, uncertainty, and change - and at times becoming increasingly unequally distributed. This leads to tension and confusion over to what extent people actually get what they deserve (i.e., fairness/meritocracy). Moreover, in many fields, humans are over-confident and pervasively confuse luck for skill (I win, it's skill; I lose, it's bad luck). In some fields, there is too much risk taking; in others, not enough. Where success derives in large part from luck - and especially where bailouts skew the incentives (heads, I win; tails, you lose) - it follows that luck is rewarded too much. This incentivizes a culture of gambling, while downplaying the importance of productive effort. And, short term success is often rewarded, irrespective, and potentially at the detriment, of the long-term system fitness. However, much success is truly meritocratic, and the problem is to discern and reward based on merit. We call this the fair reward problem. To address this, we propose three different measures to assess merit: (i) raw outcome; (ii) risk adjusted outcome, and (iii) prospective. We emphasize the need, in many cases, for the deductive prospective approach, which considers the potential of a system to adapt and mutate in novel futures. This is formalized within an evolutionary system, comprised of five processes, inter alia handling the exploration-exploitation trade-off. Several human endeavors - including finance, politics, and science -are analyzed through these lenses, and concrete solutions are proposed to support a prosperous and meritocratic society.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.04940

zbMATH Keywords

measurementequalitysuccessevolutionary learningscenario analysisrewardluckmeritdarwinian

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Game theory, economics, finance, and other social and behavioral sciences (91-XX)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The pricing of options and corporate liabilities
• A Reality Check for Data Snooping
• The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
• Critical phenomena in natural sciences. Chaos, fractals, selforganization and disorder: Concepts and tools.
• ON A CLASS OF SKEW DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS
• Zipf's law and maximum sustainable growth
• On 1/ f noise and other distributions with long tails
• A Brief History of Generative Models for Power Law and Lognormal Distributions
• Impartial division of a dollar
• A free energy principle for biological systems
• Active inference, eye movements and oculomotor delays
• Switching Costs and the Gittins Index
• Stability of democracies: a complex systems perspective

Cited In (1)

• Prediction and prevention of disproportionally dominant agents in complex networks

This page was built for publication: THE FAIR REWARD PROBLEM: THE ILLUSION OF SUCCESS AND HOW TO SOLVE IT

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6203311)