THE FAIR REWARD PROBLEM: THE ILLUSION OF SUCCESS AND HOW TO SOLVE IT

DOI10.1142/S021952591950005XMaRDI QIDQ6203311OpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors D. Sornette, Spencer Wheatley

Publication date 27 March 2024

Published in Advances in Complex Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.04940

zbMATH Keywords

measurementequalitysuccessevolutionary learningscenario analysisrewardluckmeritdarwinian

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Game theory, economics, finance, and other social and behavioral sciences (91-XX)

Abstract: Humanity has been fascinated by the pursuit of fortune since time immemorial, and many successful outcomes benefit from strokes of luck. But success is subject to complexity, uncertainty, and change - and at times becoming increasingly unequally distributed. This leads to tension and confusion over to what extent people actually get what they deserve (i.e., fairness/meritocracy). Moreover, in many fields, humans are over-confident and pervasively confuse luck for skill (I win, it's skill; I lose, it's bad luck). In some fields, there is too much risk taking; in others, not enough. Where success derives in large part from luck - and especially where bailouts skew the incentives (heads, I win; tails, you lose) - it follows that luck is rewarded too much. This incentivizes a culture of gambling, while downplaying the importance of productive effort. And, short term success is often rewarded, irrespective, and potentially at the detriment, of the long-term system fitness. However, much success is truly meritocratic, and the problem is to discern and reward based on merit. We call this the fair reward problem. To address this, we propose three different measures to assess merit: (i) raw outcome; (ii) risk adjusted outcome, and (iii) prospective. We emphasize the need, in many cases, for the deductive prospective approach, which considers the potential of a system to adapt and mutate in novel futures. This is formalized within an evolutionary system, comprised of five processes, inter alia handling the exploration-exploitation trade-off. Several human endeavors - including finance, politics, and science -are analyzed through these lenses, and concrete solutions are proposed to support a prosperous and meritocratic society.

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3609402 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1987559 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 842688 (Why is no real title available?)
• A Brief History of Generative Models for Power Law and Lognormal Distributions
• A Reality Check for Data Snooping
• A free energy principle for biological systems
• Active inference, eye movements and oculomotor delays
• Critical phenomena in natural sciences. Chaos, fractals, selforganization and disorder: Concepts and tools.
• Impartial division of a dollar
• ON A CLASS OF SKEW DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS
• On 1/ f noise and other distributions with long tails
• Stability of democracies: a complex systems perspective
• Switching Costs and the Gittins Index
• The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
• The pricing of options and corporate liabilities
• Zipf's law and maximum sustainable growth

Cited in

(1)

• Prediction and prevention of disproportionally dominant agents in complex networks

This page was built for publication: THE FAIR REWARD PROBLEM: THE ILLUSION OF SUCCESS AND HOW TO SOLVE IT

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6203311)