New upper bounds for the constants in the Bohnenblust-Hille inequality

From MaRDI portal
Publication:640973

DOI10.1016/J.JMAA.2011.08.004zbMATH Open1234.26061arXiv1010.0461OpenAlexW2963498116MaRDI QIDQ640973FDOQ640973

Daniel Pellegrino, J. B. Seoane-Sepúlveda

Publication date: 21 October 2011

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: A classical inequality due to Bohnenblust and Hille states that for every positive integer m there is a constant Cm>0 so that (sumlimits_{i_{1},...,i_{m}=1}^{N}|U(e_{i_{^{1}}},...,e_{i_{m}})| ^{frac{2m}{m+1}}) ^{frac{m+1}{2m}}leq C_{m}| U| for every positive integer N and every m-linear mapping U:ellinftyNimes...imesellinftyNightarrowmathbbC, where Cm=mfracm+12m2fracm12. The value of Cm was improved to Cm=2fracm12 by S. Kaijser and more recently H. Qu'{e}ffelec and A. Defant and P. Sevilla-Peris remarked that Cm=(frac2sqrtpi)m1 also works. The Bohnenblust--Hille inequality also holds for real Banach spaces with the constants Cm=2fracm12. In this note we show that a recent new proof of the Bohnenblust--Hille inequality (due to Defant, Popa and Schwarting) provides, in fact, quite better estimates for Cm for all values of minmathbbN. In particular, we will also show that, for real scalars, if m is even with 2leqmleq24, then C_{mathbb{R},m}=2^{1/2}C_{mathbb{R},m/2}. We will mainly work on a paper by Defant, Popa and Schwarting, giving some remarks about their work and explaining how to, numerically, improve the previously mentioned constants.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1010.0461




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (17)





This page was built for publication: New upper bounds for the constants in the Bohnenblust-Hille inequality

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q640973)