Bi-criteria evolution strategy in estimating weights from the AHP ratio-scale matrices

DOI10.1016/J.AMC.2011.06.006MaRDI QIDQ648315zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Bojan Srdjevic, Zorica Srdjevic

Publication date 22 November 2011

Published in Applied Mathematics and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.06.006

zbMATH Keywords

numerical examplesalgorithmanalytic hierarchy processevolution strategyinconsistent matricesPareto non-dominated solutionsprioritization methodratio-scale matrix

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Recommendations

• An evolutionary strategic weight manipulation approach for multi-attribute decision making: TOPSIS method
• Note on deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices in AHP
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2134680
• On multiplicative priority rating methods for the AHP
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 852071
• Assessing priority weights from subsets of pairwise comparisons in multiple criteria optimization problems
• Scales and methods for deriving weights in the analytic hierarchy process
• A method for estimating criteria weights from intuitionistic preference relations

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2086188 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3497315 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 976350 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 194544 (Why is no real title available?)
• A Goal Programming Method for Generating Priority Vectors
• A comparative study of the numerical scales and the prioritization methods in AHP
• A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets
• A differential evolution algorithm with self-adapting strategy and control parameters
• A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process
• A linear programming method for generating the most favorable weights from a pairwise comparison matrix
• A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio- scale matrices
• A new data envelopment analysis method for priority determination and group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process
• A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices
• Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications
• Combining different prioritization methods in the analytic hierarchy process synthesis
• Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process
• Deriving weights from general pairwise comparison matrices
• Differential evolution and particle swarm optimisation in partitional clustering
• Generating consensus priority point vectors: A logarithmic goal programming approach
• Parallel solution of mixed discrete structural optimization problems using evolution strategy
• Priority estimation in the AHP through maximization of correlation coefficient
• Weighted multirecombination evolution strategies

Cited in

(7)

• An evolutionary strategic weight manipulation approach for multi-attribute decision making: TOPSIS method
• Deriving priorities from pairwise comparison matrices with a novel consistency index
• Pairwise comparisons simplified
• A cosine maximization method for the priority vector derivation in AHP
• An integrated model of material supplier selection and order allocation using fuzzy extended AHP and multiobjective programming
• A direct projection-based group decision-making methodology with crisp values and interval data
• Consistency issues of interval pairwise comparison matrices

This page was built for publication: Bi-criteria evolution strategy in estimating weights from the AHP ratio-scale matrices

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q648315)