Bi-criteria evolution strategy in estimating weights from the AHP ratio-scale matrices
DOI10.1016/J.AMC.2011.06.006zbMATH Open1229.65070OpenAlexW1981067290MaRDI QIDQ648315FDOQ648315
Authors: Bojan Srdjevic, Zorica Srdjevic
Publication date: 22 November 2011
Published in: Applied Mathematics and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.06.006
Recommendations
- An evolutionary strategic weight manipulation approach for multi-attribute decision making: TOPSIS method
- Note on deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices in AHP
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2134680
- On multiplicative priority rating methods for the AHP
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 852071
- Assessing priority weights from subsets of pairwise comparisons in multiple criteria optimization problems
- Scales and methods for deriving weights in the analytic hierarchy process
- A method for estimating criteria weights from intuitionistic preference relations
numerical examplesalgorithmanalytic hierarchy processevolution strategyinconsistent matricesPareto non-dominated solutionsprioritization methodratio-scale matrix
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A Goal Programming Method for Generating Priority Vectors
- Deriving weights from general pairwise comparison matrices
- Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications
- A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process
- A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio- scale matrices
- A differential evolution algorithm with self-adapting strategy and control parameters
- Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A linear programming method for generating the most favorable weights from a pairwise comparison matrix
- Differential evolution and particle swarm optimisation in partitional clustering
- A comparative study of the numerical scales and the prioritization methods in AHP
- Generating consensus priority point vectors: A logarithmic goal programming approach
- A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets
- Combining different prioritization methods in the analytic hierarchy process synthesis
- A new data envelopment analysis method for priority determination and group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process
- Priority estimation in the AHP through maximization of correlation coefficient
- Weighted multirecombination evolution strategies
- Parallel solution of mixed discrete structural optimization problems using evolution strategy
Cited In (7)
- An evolutionary strategic weight manipulation approach for multi-attribute decision making: TOPSIS method
- Deriving priorities from pairwise comparison matrices with a novel consistency index
- Pairwise comparisons simplified
- A cosine maximization method for the priority vector derivation in AHP
- An integrated model of material supplier selection and order allocation using fuzzy extended AHP and multiobjective programming
- A direct projection-based group decision-making methodology with crisp values and interval data
- Consistency issues of interval pairwise comparison matrices
This page was built for publication: Bi-criteria evolution strategy in estimating weights from the AHP ratio-scale matrices
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q648315)