An evolutionary strategic weight manipulation approach for multi-attribute decision making: TOPSIS method
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2658035
DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2020.11.004OpenAlexW3101162656MaRDI QIDQ2658035FDOQ2658035
Authors: Yanyan Li
Publication date: 18 March 2021
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2020.11.004
Recommendations
- Multiple-objective genetic algorithm using the multiple criteria decision making method TOPSIS
- TOPSIS algorithm for multi-attribute group decision-making with weighted ordinal preferences
- Bi-criteria evolution strategy in estimating weights from the AHP ratio-scale matrices
- TOPSIS based interactive multi-attributes group decision-making method and its application
- A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS
- Modification of TOPSIS method for solving of multicriteria tasks
- A novel method of combination weighting for multiple attribute decision making
- An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for multiple attribute decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy setting
Cites Work
- Evaluation of ranking accuracy in multi-criteria decisions
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications. A state-of- the-art survey
- The maximizing deviation method for group multiple attribute decision making under linguistic environment
- Tools for interactive multiattribute decision making with incompletely identified information
- An interactive procedure for multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete information: Range-based approach
- An approach to multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information on alternatives
- Comparing methods for multiattribute decision making with ordinal weights
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights
- Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method
- An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making
- Estimation of Attribute Weights from Preference Comparisons
- Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models
- Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making
- Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences
- Defending against strategic manipulation in uninorm-based multi-agent decision making
- An interactive procedure for linguistic multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information
- A general multiple attribute decision-making approach for integrating subjective preferences and objective information
- Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods
- Establishing strict dominance between alternatives with special type of incomplete information
- A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights
- Preference modeling experiments with surrogate weighting procedures for the PROMETHEE method
Cited In (3)
- Editorial. Special issue on knowledge enhanced data analytics for autonomous decision making (KEDA for DM)
- Minimum cost strategic weight assignment for multiple attribute decision-making problem using robust optimization approach
- Bi-criteria evolution strategy in estimating weights from the AHP ratio-scale matrices
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: An evolutionary strategic weight manipulation approach for multi-attribute decision making: TOPSIS method
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2658035)