Are deterministic descriptions and indeterministic descriptions observationally equivalent?
DOI10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.06.004zbMath1228.00017arXiv1310.1615OpenAlexW2053918196WikidataQ56083277 ScholiaQ56083277MaRDI QIDQ652770
Publication date: 17 December 2011
Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.1615
Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Signal detection and filtering (aspects of stochastic processes) (60G35) Foundations of equilibrium statistical mechanics (82B03) Axioms; other general questions in probability (60A05) Physics (00A79)
Related Items (10)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Laplace's demon consults an oracle: the computational complexity of prediction
- The ergodic hierarchy, randomness and Hamiltonian chaos
- The Lorenz attractor is mixing
- Absolutely continuous invariant measures for one-parameter families of one-dimensional maps
- Sinai-Bowen-Ruelle measures for certain Hénon maps
- The noninvariance of deterministic causal models
- Kolmogorov's work on ergodic theory
- Almost every real quadratic map is either regular or stochastic.
- In general a measure preserving transformation is mixing
- Justifying Definitions in Mathematics--Going Beyond Lakatos
- Ergodic Theory, Randomness, and "Chaos"
- What Are the New Implications of Chaos for Unpredictability?
- Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors
- Law and Prediction in the Light of Chaos Research
- Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics
- Statistical properties of chaotic systems
This page was built for publication: Are deterministic descriptions and indeterministic descriptions observationally equivalent?