Drawing the line between kinematics and dynamics in special relativity
DOI10.1016/J.SHPSB.2008.06.004zbMATH Open1228.83010OpenAlexW2147449898MaRDI QIDQ652790FDOQ652790
Authors: Michel Janssen
Publication date: 17 December 2011
Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/3895/1/kin-vs-dyn.pdf
File on IPFS (Hint: this is only the Hash - if you get a timeout, this file is not available on our server.)
Recommendations
kinematicsMinkowski space-timeLorentz invarianceinference to the best explanationclassical electron modelsTrouton-Noble experiment
History of mathematics in the 19th century (01A55) Special relativity (83A05) History of relativity and gravitational theory (83-03)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Einstein, Nordström and the early demise of scalar, Lorentz-covariant theories of gravitation
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Reconsidering a scientific revolution: the case of Einstein versus Lorentz
- Mechanisms, principles, and Lorentz's cautious realism
- COIStories: Explanation and Evidence in the History of Science
- Laws and meta-laws of nature: conservation laws and symmetries
- On the verge of \textit{Umdeutung} in Minnesota: Van Vleck and the correspondence principle. I.
- Length matters: the Einstein-Swann correspondence and the constructive approach to the special theory of relativity
- Pascual Jordan's resolution of the conundrum of the wave-particle duality of light
- The turning point for Einstein's annus mirabilis
- Electron spin or ``classically non-describable two-valuedness
- Self-Energy and Stability of the Classical Electron
- Fresnel's (dragging) coefficient as a challenge to 19th century optics of moving bodies
Cited In (26)
- On the empirical equivalence between special relativity and Lorentz's ether theory
- The limitations of inertial frame spacetime functionalism
- Against `functional gravitational energy': a critical note on functionalism, selective realism, and geometric objects and gravitational energy
- Two miracles of general relativity
- Kinematic subtleties in Einstein’s first derivation of the Lorentz transformations
- On Fermi's resolution of the ``4/3 problem in the classical theory of the electron
- Conservation, inertia, and spacetime geometry
- Physical relativity from a functionalist perspective
- Why not a sound postulate?
- Explanation, analyticity and constitutive principles in spacetime theories
- Geometrical Constructivism and Modal Relationalism: Further Aspects of the Dynamical/Geometrical Debate
- 'But one must not legalize the mentioned sin': phenomenological vs. dynamical treatments of rods and clocks in Einstein's thought
- How did Lorentz find his theorem of corresponding states?
- Minkowski spacetime and Lorentz invariance: the cart and the horse or two sides of a single coin?
- On explaining non-dynamically the quantum correlations via quantum information theory: what it takes
- Principle or constructive relativity
- In defense of a ``single-world interpretation of quantum mechanics
- Quantum theory is not only about information
- `Two dogmas' redux
- Length matters: the Einstein-Swann correspondence and the constructive approach to the special theory of relativity
- IS PHYSICS ASKING FOR A NEW KINEMATICS?
- Equivariant mappings and invariant sets on Minkowski space
- Motion, inertia and special relativity—a novel perspective
- Heuristics versus norms: on the relativistic responses to the Kaufmann experiments
- Einstein's reinterpretation of the Fizeau experiment: how it turned out to be crucial for special relativity
- Fantastic beasts and where (not) to find them: local gravitational energy and energy conservation in general relativity
This page was built for publication: Drawing the line between kinematics and dynamics in special relativity
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q652790)