On the empirical equivalence between special relativity and Lorentz's ether theory
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2351909
DOI10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.01.002zbMath1315.83003OpenAlexW2137432874MaRDI QIDQ2351909
Publication date: 26 June 2015
Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.01.002
Related Items (4)
Minkowski spacetime and Lorentz invariance: the cart and the horse or two sides of a single coin? ⋮ Inertial Trajectories in de Broglie-Bohm Quantum Theory: An Unexpected Problem ⋮ Einstein's reinterpretation of the Fizeau experiment: how it turned out to be crucial for special relativity ⋮ How did Lorentz find his theorem of corresponding states?
Cites Work
- Principle or constructive relativity
- Henri Poincaré's criticism of fin de siècle electrodynamics
- Drawing the line between kinematics and dynamics in special relativity
- Reconsidering a scientific revolution: the case of Einstein versus Lorentz
- Why was relativity accepted?
- Mechanisms, principles, and Lorentz's cautious realism
- The origins of length contraction: I. The FitzGerald–Lorentz deformation hypothesis
- COIStories: Explanation and Evidence in the History of Science
- I.—STUDIES IN THE LOGIC OF CONFIRMATION (I.)
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: On the empirical equivalence between special relativity and Lorentz's ether theory