Do applied statisticians prefer more randomness or less? Bootstrap or jackknife?

DOI10.1007/S11222-024-10388-7MaRDI QIDQ6547742zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Yannis G. Yatracos

Publication date 31 May 2024

Published in Statistics and Computing (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

mean squared errorbig datavariabilityinadmissibilitybootstrap asymptoticsrisk averse decision maker

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics (62-08) Asymptotic distribution theory in statistics (62E20) Nonparametric statistical resampling methods (62G09)

Recommendations

• Jackknifing the bootstrap: some monte carlo evidence
• Another look at the jackknife: Further examples of generalized bootstrap
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1779497
• Mean squared errors of bootstrap variance estimators for \(U\)-statistics
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 409718

Cites work

• Artificially Augmented Samples, Shrinkage, and Mean Squared Error Reduction*
• Assessing the quality of bootstrap samples and of the bootstrap estimates obtained with finite resampling.
• Bootstrap and wild bootstrap for high dimensional linear models
• Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife
• Inference from small and big data sets with error rates
• Intentionally Biased Bootstrap Methods
• Jackknife approximations to bootstrap estimates
• Jackknife, bootstrap and other resampling methods in regression analysis
• On the number of bootstrap simulations required to construct a confidence interval

This page was built for publication: Do applied statisticians prefer more randomness or less? Bootstrap or jackknife?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6547742)