Do applied statisticians prefer more randomness or less? Bootstrap or jackknife?

DOI10.1007/S11222-024-10388-7zbMATH Open1539.62037MaRDI QIDQ6547742FDOQ6547742

Authors: Yannis G. Yatracos 

Publication date: 31 May 2024

Published in: Statistics and Computing (Search for Journal in Brave)

Recommendations

• Jackknifing the bootstrap: some monte carlo evidence
• Another look at the jackknife: Further examples of generalized bootstrap
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1779497
• Mean squared errors of bootstrap variance estimators for \(U\)-statistics
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 409718

zbMATH Keywords

mean squared errorbig datavariabilityinadmissibilitybootstrap asymptoticsrisk averse decision maker

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics (62-08) Asymptotic distribution theory in statistics (62E20) Nonparametric statistical resampling methods (62G09)

Cites Work

• Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife
• Jackknife, bootstrap and other resampling methods in regression analysis
• Bootstrap and wild bootstrap for high dimensional linear models
• On the number of bootstrap simulations required to construct a confidence interval
• Intentionally Biased Bootstrap Methods
• Jackknife approximations to bootstrap estimates
• Assessing the quality of bootstrap samples and of the bootstrap estimates obtained with finite resampling.
• Inference from small and big data sets with error rates
• Artificially Augmented Samples, Shrinkage, and Mean Squared Error Reduction*

This page was built for publication: Do applied statisticians prefer more randomness or less? Bootstrap or jackknife?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6547742)