Goodness and lack of fit tests to pretest normality when comparing means

DOI10.37190/ORD240106MaRDI QIDQ6566817zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Pablo M. Flores, María de Lourdes Palacios

Publication date 3 July 2024

Published in Operations Research and Decisions (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.37190/ORD240106

zbMATH Keywords

assumptionsequivalencegoodness of fitlack of fitnormalityType I error probability

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Cites work

• A method for simulating non-normal distributions
• An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)
• Contribution to the theory of ``Student's \(t\)-test as applied to the problem of two samples.
• Heteroscedasticity irrelevance when testing means difference
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3103748 (Why is no real title available?)
• On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other
• ON THE COMPARISON OF SEVERAL MEAN VALUES: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH
• On the criterion, that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling.
• Practical Solutions of the Behrens-Fisher Problem
• Pretesting strategies for homoscedasticity when comparing means. Their robustness facing non-normality
• Science and Statistics
• Testing Statistical Hypotheses of Equivalence and Noninferiority
• The Limiting Distributions of Certain Statistics
• THE PROBABLE ERROR OF A MEAN
• The two-sample \(t\) test: pre-testing its assumptions does not pay off

This page was built for publication: Goodness and lack of fit tests to pretest normality when comparing means

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6566817)