Which set of agents plays a key role? An impossibility in transforming binary relations

DOI10.1016/J.MATHSOCSCI.2024.02.003MaRDI QIDQ6575502zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Takahiro Suzuki, Masahide Horita

Publication date 20 July 2024

Published in Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATHSOCSCI.2024.02.003

zbMATH Keywords

ceteris paribus comparisonpreference extensionself-reflectionsocial ranking problem

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Group preferences (91B10) Social choice (91B14)

Recommendations

• Axiomatic foundations for ranking systems
• Ranking sets of interacting objects via semivalues
• Ranking opportunity sets and Arrow impossibility theorems: Correspondence results
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3894772
• Preference extension rules for ranking sets of alternatives with a fixed cardinality

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3078997 (Why is no real title available?)
• Multiattribute signed orders
• On stable rules for selecting committees
• Ranking objects from a preference relation over their subsets
• Signed orders and power set extensions
• Some axiomatic and algorithmic perspectives on the social ranking problem
• Some startling inconsistencies when electing committees
• The Condorcet criterion and committee selection

This page was built for publication: Which set of agents plays a key role? An impossibility in transforming binary relations

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6575502)